Compare
PeopleBlade compared with Clay
Clay and PeopleBlade both get called CRMs, and they solve different problems. Clay is a go-to-market data platform for teams building prospecting pipelines; PeopleBlade is a personal contact book for the people you already know. This page exists because the two surface in the same searches, and picking between them is really picking between a sales tool and an address book.
What Clay does
Clay is a hosted data platform for go-to-market work. Teams build tables of companies and people, enrich them through waterfall lookups across a marketplace of more than 200 providers, track signals such as job changes, and feed the results to outreach: a native email sequencer, ad audiences, and CRM sync. Claygent is its AI researcher, and webhook, HTTP-API, and MCP automation cover the tooling side, with Clay's own API reserved for Enterprise.
The pricing page lists a free plan with unlimited seats and tables of up to 200 rows, then Launch listed from $167 a month and Growth from $446 a month, with usage expanding above those starting points, and custom Enterprise pricing. Exporting a table is a first-class feature: Tools → Export opens a modal that downloads a CSV, and past exports stay listed under Available Exports.
What PeopleBlade does
PeopleBlade is a personal contact book, not a pipeline tool. It unifies the people already in your macOS Contacts, Google Contacts, Beeper, WhatsApp, iMessage interaction metadata, and LinkedIn, Instagram, and X exports into one SQLite file on your computer, records where each detail came from, and lets you review every suggested merge before it happens.
Private notes sit beside each person. Your agent works the book through peopleblade JSON commands and can receive one person's background as a packet, and optional hosted research fills in a selected contact's public details for prepaid credits. There is no list building, no enrichment waterfall, no sequencer, and no team workspace.
Public CLI · npm 0.6.0. Install it with bun add --global @hraness/peopleblade@0.6.0 on macOS or Linux.
How they compare
The short version is that these are different categories sharing three letters. Clay turns prospects into pipeline; PeopleBlade keeps track of relationships you already have. The table lines them up anyway, since searchers land on both.
| Aspect | Clay | PeopleBlade |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Build and enrich prospect lists for a go-to-market team, then act on them | Keep one private book of the people you already know |
| Who it is for | GTM teams, sales reps, and RevOps running campaigns | One person, and the agents that work for them |
| Records | Companies and people assembled into tables for a campaign, with a free tier capped at 200 rows per table | Your contacts, unified from the accounts and archives you actually use, with no row cap |
| Enrichment | Waterfall enrichment across a 200-plus provider marketplace, signals such as job changes, and Claygent AI research | Optional hosted research on one selected contact at a time, cited and prepaid per contact, or your own agent |
| Outreach | A native email sequencer, ad-audience pushes, and CRM sync on paid tiers | None; PeopleBlade never sends outreach |
| Cost | A free plan for small tables; paid plans listed from $167 a month for Launch and $446 a month for Growth; Enterprise is custom | Free and MIT licensed; optional hosted research is prepaid per contact |
| Agent access | Webhook and HTTP-API automation on paid tiers; Clay's own API unlocks at Enterprise | Local JSON CLI commands, one-person packets for an agent, and an approved-device API over synced contacts |
| Getting data out | Tools → Export → Download CSV writes a table to a CSV file, with an export history | The SQLite file is yours outright; synced contacts also export as CSV through the approved-device API |
Leaving Clay with a contact list
If a Clay table holds people you want to keep as contacts rather than prospects, export it first: choose Tools → Export on the table and download the CSV. PeopleBlade has no generic CSV importer, so the file needs one intermediate stop: import the CSV into Google Contacts and run peopleblade google sync --auth gmail-main --json, or convert it to vCards, load them into macOS Contacts, and run peopleblade contacts sync --json. Campaign fields that do not map to names, organizations, titles, birthdays, emails, and phones do not carry.
Which one fits
Choose Clay when the work is outbound: prospect lists, multi-provider enrichment, sequences, and CRM handoff for a team that measures pipeline.
Choose PeopleBlade when the work is remembering actual relationships: one private, free book on your computer that your agent can search and annotate. If you reached this page looking for a cheaper Clay for personal use, the fit is real only at the address-book level.
Questions
Can PeopleBlade replace Clay?
Only when Clay was being used as a personal address book. PeopleBlade cannot build prospect lists, run enrichment waterfalls, score signals, or send sequences, and it does not try to.
Can I import a Clay CSV into PeopleBlade?
Not directly, because there is no generic CSV or vCard import. Put the CSV through Google Contacts or macOS Contacts first, then run the matching PeopleBlade sync command, and fields beyond ordinary contact details stay behind.
Does PeopleBlade do enrichment like Clay?
At a different scale. Hosted research looks up one contact you select, cites its sources, and costs prepaid credits per contact, or your own agent researches a one-person packet. There is no bulk enrichment over a table.
Is Clay free like PeopleBlade?
Clay has a free plan limited to small tables of 200 rows; paid team plans are listed from $167 a month. PeopleBlade's local CLI and workspace are free and MIT licensed with no row limit, and only optional hosted research costs anything.
Sources
- Clay pricing: free tier, Launch, Growth, and EnterpriseClayChecked
- Clay University: Getting your lists out of ClayClay UniversityChecked
- Clay: build systems to grow revenueClayChecked